<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In Defense of Music and Standards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johnmcdonald.info/defending-music/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johnmcdonald.info/defending-music/</link>
	<description>Blogging about politics, life, and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 06:13:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: hbdt20499</title>
		<link>http://johnmcdonald.info/defending-music/comment-page-1/#comment-3247</link>
		<dc:creator>hbdt20499</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnmcdonald.info/?p=114#comment-3247</guid>
		<description>Interesting blog and well-written piece. And yes, Jackson is certainly not an Xer. I see it as rather sad that some Xers look at people like Obama and Jackson and somehow try to claim they are Xers when they so obviously aren&#039;t.

Jackson certainly did have a big impact on Generation X. But most Xers were too young to have felt the full effect of this legend. He is fundamentally an icon of Generation Jones—-born 1954 to 1965, between the Boomers and GenXers. Jackson--born in 1958-- was a classic GenJoneser himself. 

If you’re not familiar with the term yet, google Generation Jones, and you’ll see it’s recently gotten a ton of media attention, and many top commentators from many top publications and networks (Washington Post, Time magazine, NBC, Newsweek, ABC, etc.) now specifically use this term. The Associated Press&#039; annual Trend Report chose the Rise of Generation Jones as the #1 trend of 2009.

Here&#039;s a page with a good overview of recent stuff about GenJones:
http://generationjones.com/2009latest.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting blog and well-written piece. And yes, Jackson is certainly not an Xer. I see it as rather sad that some Xers look at people like Obama and Jackson and somehow try to claim they are Xers when they so obviously aren&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Jackson certainly did have a big impact on Generation X. But most Xers were too young to have felt the full effect of this legend. He is fundamentally an icon of Generation Jones—-born 1954 to 1965, between the Boomers and GenXers. Jackson&#8211;born in 1958&#8211; was a classic GenJoneser himself. </p>
<p>If you’re not familiar with the term yet, google Generation Jones, and you’ll see it’s recently gotten a ton of media attention, and many top commentators from many top publications and networks (Washington Post, Time magazine, NBC, Newsweek, ABC, etc.) now specifically use this term. The Associated Press&#8217; annual Trend Report chose the Rise of Generation Jones as the #1 trend of 2009.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a page with a good overview of recent stuff about GenJones:<br />
<a href="http://generationjones.com/2009latest.html" rel="nofollow">http://generationjones.com/2009latest.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.511 seconds -->

